The deployment of the SANDF to fight crime is a recipe for disaster and is likely to undermine – in a very public way – the legitimate right of the state to use violence.
Last week, President Cyril Ramaphosa praised the South African National Defense Force (SANDF) for its role in supporting police anti-crime efforts, claiming the force is well equipped and doing a “fantastic job”. However, this approach carries significant risks, and by blurring the lines between domestic law enforcement and military intervention, the state risks damaging its own authority.
It's easy to sympathize with those who live in one of the many communities where life is defined by violent crime.
We have become so desensitized to the horrific reality of families drowning in bathtubs and gangs claiming sovereign territory on our streets that we have lost our capacity for outrage. It is only when we step back from this “new normal” that the magnitude of the situation becomes apparent.
What should I follow WhatsApp | Linkedin for latest headlines
Obviously, this means that many people will welcome the deployment of the SANDF.
However, it was surprising to hear that Ramaphosa told Parliament: “This time, we have developed our defense force capabilities so well that they build bridges, they rescue people in danger. They also help support the police.”
Where is the proof of this?
SANDF 'free falling towards obsolescence'
As John Stupart has written, the SANDF is falling apart.
This is not…